Asas-asas hubungan kemasyarakatan antara agama dalam perspektif Islam dan Kristian
The foundations of interfaith societal relations in Islamic and Christian perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v6i2.218Keywords:
Foundations, Societal Relations, Religion, GuidelinesAbstract
Religious diversity is unique to a society. Every country wants peace and harmony in its society, especially a country that has a society of various religions and races. Harmony is one of the main factors in the progress of a country. However, interfaith societal relations require a solid foundation to guide all levels of society in building harmonious social relations. This study refers to previous studies related to the concept of society, the foundations of interfaith societal relations according to Islam and Christianity, and the factors that contribute to neglecting the foundations of interfaith societal relations. The analysis of this study aims to identify the foundations established in Islam and Christianity for interfaith societal relations by examining the texts from the Quran and the Bible. The basic theme of interfaith societal relations is derived from the findings and explanations in both the Qur'an and the Bible, including getting to know and helping each other, being respectful, and being kind. Further, the foundations of these religious teachings show that each religion plays an essential role in upholding interfaith societal relations. This study is qualitative, and data were obtained through previous studies and texts from the Quran and the Bible. The information and data are analysed to ascertain the validity of the sources. The foundations of interfaith societal relations based on religious texts need to be highlighted for society to understand that Islam and Christianity do not reject interfaith societal relations but draw certain limits and guidelines that need to be followed.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M.S., Noor, M.M., Yusof, A.N., & Husain, F.C. (2018). Konsep komuniti dan perkembangannya: suatu tinjauan kritikal terhadap penggunaannya. e-BANGI Journal, 12(3), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/7281a09c1fe39b336a81d4ff3998b1f1/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=616374.
Aemy, E. M. Z., Norsaadah, D., Nazneen, I., & Maryam, H. K. (2018). Mendepani masyarakat majmuk di Malaysia melalui ilmu perbandingan Agama: Tinjauan awal. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 10(1), 163-175. Retrieved from http://spaj.ukm.my/jalhikmah/index.php/jalhikmah/article/view/325.
Anon. (2007). Where Love and Justice Meet. Restorative Justice Bible Study. Washington, DC: Prison Fellowship International. Retrieved from http://restorativejustice.org/rj-library/where-love-and-justice-meet/9031/.
Andreas, S. (2008). Sosiologi 1. Bogor, Indonesia: Yudhistira Quadra.
Armstrong, K. (1993). A history of God. London: Heinemann.
Arthur, J., & Bailey, R. (2000). Schools and community: The communitarian agenda in education. London, UK: Falmer Press.
Azizan, B., Zaid, A., Tarmizi, A. & Jayum. (2014). Kajian isu dan cabaran hubungan antara penganut agama di Malaysia. Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication /288827698.
Aziera, N. M. R., Faizal, M. P. R, Rawi, N., & Siti, N. H. (2017). Kepelbagaian dan kesepaduan etnik di Malaysia menurut Islam. Jurnal Sains Insani, 2(2): 8897. https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol2no2.41.
Baharom, N. et al. (2005). Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. Kuala Lumpur, KL: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Basmeih, A. (2006). Tafsir pimpinan ar-Rahman kepada pengertian al-Quran. Kuala Lumpur, KL: Dar al-Kitab.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Calvin, J. (2013). Calvin's Complete Commentary on the Bible. United States of America: Delmarva Publications.
Damsar. (2017). Pengantar teori Sosiologi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana.
Dimodica, A., Emily, B. E., & Cohen, R. (2010). Bridging Babel: New social media and interreligious and interculture understanding. Berkley Centre Undergraduate Fellowship Report. United States, USA: Georgetown University.
Disha, I., Cavendish, J. C., & King, R. D. (2011). Historical events and spaces of hate: hate crimes against Arabs and Muslims in Post-9/11 America. Social Problems, 58(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2011.58.1.21.
Dupree, N. (2006). The Religion Century. Retrieved from http://www.nickscrusade.org/the-religion-century/, 12 September 2006.
al-Fāyūmī, A. M. A. A. (2006). Majallāt al-daᶜwah fi al-Qur’ān wa uṣūluha. al-Ḥarām, KSA: Maktabah Aulād al-Syaikh.
Fathi, O. (1997). Concepts of the Quran: a topical reading. Kuala Lumpur, KL: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia.
Frances, S. A. (2019). Making friends with people of other religions: Pitfalls of giftive mission. Missiology: An International Review, 47(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091829618814778.
Fuller, G. E. (2010). A world without Islam. New York, NY: Little Brown and Company.
al-Gharyanī, A. M. A. A. (2006). al-Taᶜāyush al-silmi fi uṣur al-duwal al-islāmiyyah. Nadwah al-Duwaliyyah al- Taᶜāyush al-Silmi fi al-Islām. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Rābiṭah al-ᶜAlam al-Islāmī & al Markaz al- Islāmī.
Habib, M. (2009) Inter-faith understanding and the Koran: Islam and the modern age. New Delhi, India: Zakir Husain Institute of Islamic Studies.
Hakim, A.M., Ros, M.M., Mashitah, S. &Latifah, A. L. (2019). Muslim-Christian relations in Malaysia: issues and solutions. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(1): 347-353. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7140.
Hawwā, S. (2003). Ar-Rasūl Ṣalallāhu ‘Alaihi Wasallam. Kuala Lumpur, KL: Darulfikir.
Henry, M. (1991). Matthew Henry's commentary on the whole Bible. LLC: Matthew Henry Publisher Marketing.
Hogan, J. (2005). The psychology of terrorism. London, UK: Routledge.
Hood, S. (2007). Guidelines for interfaith event and dialogue. Retrieved from https://www.ireland.anglican.org/resources/268/guidelines-for-interfaith-events-dialogue.
Horbanus, S. (2019). Konsep sesamaku manusia dalam Lukas 10:25-27. Voice of Wesley: Jurnal Ilmiah Musik dan Agama, 3(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.36972/jvow.v3i1.38.
Hornby, A. (2004). Oxford advanced dictionary. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. London, UK: Simon & Schuster.
Ibn Kathīr, M. I. (2005). Tafsir Ibn Kathīr. Indonesia: Pustaka Imam asy-Syafi’i.
Jenik, C. (2021). The world's largest religious groups over time (Statista Portal). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/chart/25572/worlds-largest-religious-groups-over-time/.
Jodock, D., & Mary, K. (2016). A Christian view of inter-religious relations: A modified excerpt from engaging others, knowing ourselves. Collegeville Institute. Retrieved from https://collegevilleinstitute.org/bearings/christian-view-inter-religious-relations/.
Keddie, G. A. (2020). “Who is my neighbor?” ethnic boundaries and the Samaritan other in Luke 10:25-37, Biblical Interpretation, 28(2), 246-271. doi:10.1163/15685152-00282P06.
Kumar, K. A. (2017). Concept of society and culture. India: Indira Gandhi National Open University. Retrieved from http://egyankosh.ac.in//handle/123456789/41246.
Khadher, A., Mustaffa. A., Sedek, A., & Yakub, M. (2016). Fanatik beragama dalam kalangan masyarakat Islam di Malaysia: analisis berdasarkan pemahaman terhadap fiqh al-hadith. International Conference On Islam In Malay World Vi. Retrieved From http://eprints.um.edu.my/16536/1/.
Khairul, A. M. (2003). Kepelbagaian kaum dalam Islam: Hakikat dan tuntutan. Seminar Hak dan Tanggungjawab Pelbagai Kaum dalam Sebuah Negara Islam. Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 7–8 May.
Khairul, A. M., Faqih, A., & Hilmi, M. (2018). Prinsip asas interaksi inter-agama di Malaysia menurut Islam. Prosiding Kolokium Penyelidikan Kebangsaan. Melaka: Kolej Universiti Islam Melaka.
Lichtblau, E. (2016). Hate crimes against American Muslims most since post-9/11 era. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/18/us/politics/hate-crimes-american-muslims-rise.html.
Meyer, H. A. W. (1983). Critical and exegetical, handbook to the Gospel of Mark and Luke. United States, USA: Hendrickson Publisher.
Munawar, A. I., & Mohd Nor, S. A. (2019). Mengenali kuantitatif dan kualitatif dalam penyelidikan pengajian Islam. Bangi: UKM Press.
Munawar, A. I., Muhaimin, A. M., & Izhar, M. A. M. K. (2021). Mengenal pasti perwatakan ekstremis melalui disiplin fiqh taayush. Islāmiyyāt, 43(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2021-4301-11.
al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (1992). Ghayr al-muslimīn fi al-mujtama‘ al-Islāmī. Kaherah: Maktabah Wahbah.
al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (1996). Membangun ummah: suatu kenyataan bukan khayalan. Batu Caves: Thinker's Library.
al-Sharīf, M. M. (2013). al-Taqārub wa ta‘āyush ma‘a ghayr al-muslimīn. Arab Saudi, KSA: Dār Andalūs al-Hirā.
al-Sirjānī, R. (2010). Fann al-ta‘āmul al-nabawī ma‘a ghayr al-muslimīn. Kaherah: Dār Aqlam.
Yusri, M. (2019). Sekularisme: faktor, penyebaran dan langkah mengatasinya dari sudut pandang Islam. International. Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language, 2(8), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijhpl.280015.
Mutsalim, K. & Jaffary, A. (2014). Toleransi beragama dan implikasi dalam kalangan mahasiswa/i muslim Buddha di prince of Songkla university. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 5(2), 1-14. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7827/.
Muzaffar, C. (2005). Global ethic or global hegemony? Kuala Lumpur, KL: Asean Academic Press.
Nazri, M. M., Yusri, N. M., & Hidayat, A. B. (2011). Hubungan etnik di Malaysia dari perspektif Islam. Kajian Malaysia, 29(1), 1–28. Retrieved from http://web.usm.my/km/29(1)2011/KM%20ART%201(1-28).
Nazneen, I., Norul, H. B., Mariam, A. M. & Hasnan, K. (2019). Pengamalan hidup beragama dalam kalangan mahasiswa institut pengajian tinggi Islam di Malaysia. Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 4(2), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v4i2.57.
Nursila. (2019). Interaksi sosial masyarakat dalam al-Quran (Telaah Qs: al-Hujurat ayat 13). (Tesis Sarjana). Institut Agama Islam Negeri. Retrieved from http://repository.iainpalopo.ac.id/id/eprint/2633/.
Osborn, R. E. (2021). Disciples of Christ. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/ topic/Disciples-of-Christ.
Palomo, M. M. (1984). Contemporary sociological theory. Jakarta: Cv. Rajawali.
Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Paul, B. H., & Chester, L., H. (1984). Sociology. Singapore: Mc Graw-Hill Book Co.
Richard, T. S. (2003). Sociology with free socworld with powerweb (8th ed.). United State. USA: McGraw-Hill.
Schutlz, J. (2002). John Schutlz’s commentaries. Retrieved from https://bible-commentaries.com/.
Shamsul, A. (2012). Modul hubungan etnik. Bangi: Institut kajian etnik Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Syatirah, W. W. S. & Zuliana, Z. (2020) Perpaduan dalam membentuk keamanan umat Islam di Malaysia. Proceedings of the 7th International Prophetic Conference (SWAN) 2020. Retrieved from https://oarep.usim.edu.my/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6952/1/BM005%20%20Perpaduan%20Dalam%20Membentuk%20Keamanan%20Umat%20Islam%20Di%20Malaysia.pdf.
al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. J. (2007). Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam.
Troll, C. W. (2008). Towards common ground between Christians and Muslims. In A. Wasey (ed.). Islam and the Modern Age. New Delhi, India: Zakir Husain Institute of Islamic Studies.
Wilkinson, C. G. (t.th.). Living with others faiths: A presence and engagement resource. Contextual Theology Centre. Retrieved from http://www.theology-centre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Living-with-other-faiths-A-Presence-and-Engagement-Resource.pdf.
Yohanes, K. S. (2018). “Menjadi sesama manusia” persahabatan sebagai tema teologis dan implikasinya bagi kehidupan bergereja. Dunamis: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani, 2(2). Retrieved From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324814119.
al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1991). al-Tafsīr al-Munīr. Jil. 27. Damsyik: Dār al-Fikr.
Zulkefli, M. I. I., Endut, M. N. A. A., Abdullah, M. R. T. L., & Baharuddin, A. (2018). Towards ensuring inter-religious harmony in a multi-religious society of Perak. In SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 53, p. 04006). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185304006.
Zulkifli, H. (2012). Memahami isu islamofobia: antara persepsi dan realiti. Bengkel kefahaman Islamofobia. Kuala Lumpur, KL: Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan (JAWI).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code, or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
